Reading Guide
Karl Marx in Sociology
and Anthropology |
|
Collins and Makowsky, Ch. 2 (skip the
final section on Engels)
This chapter is a useful introduction
to Marx, but it is only that: reading even a bit of Marx himself,
combined with textual analysis in class, will enable us to go
much deeper. Still, the chapter provides a useful overview of
Marx's life and work. Keep in mind, however, that our interest
in Marx in this course is primarily as a sociological theorist,
not as an economist or as a political figure.
Pay particular attention to the
sections on "Marx's Sociology" and "Marx's Theory
of Politics."
1. What do C&M mean by saying that Marx's research and theory are mainly about capitalism, not socialism? What doomed him to "a life in the underground"?
2. C&M say that Marx provided
an original theory of "how classes are produced." What
was his theory about this? What is distinctive about his concept of class, compared to others?
2. What was Marx's theory of class
consciousnesss? What did he mean by "false consciousness"? What is ideology and how can ideology be a form of power?
3. What is Marx's theory of the
state? How did he interpret political struggles and what did he
believe determined their outcome?
4. What did Marx mean when he said:
"Force is the midwife of every old society pregnant with
a new one"?
5. What do C&M mean when they
say that "Marx's sociology appears to be basically correct"?
6. In the section on Marx's Social
and Political Phiosophy, pay attention to the concept of alienation
and the role it played in Marx's theory.
"Manifesto
of the Communist Party, Section I: Bourgeois and Proletarians" (online; relate to C&M's "Marx's Sociology' and the Coser reading below)
You may already have read the "Communist
Manifesto" in other courses. It provides the most readable
introduction to Marx's thought available, and there's a whole
theory of society and social change in it. It's a good way to
start with Marx, but as we'll see, the Manifesto has two limitations:
1) as a polemical document, prepared as a political manifesto,
it tends to simplify and overstate positions which Marx explored
with more subtlety in other writings; 2) its emphasis on class
struggle provides insight into one side of Marx's theory, but
it says less about the other, more structural, side. In any case,
despite its status as probably the most famous political manifesto
ever written, I want you to focus not on its politics but on the
sociological theory it presents. There is a tremendous amount
of sophisticated sociological theory packed into this short statement.
1. What does it mean to say that
the history of hitherto existing societies is the history of class
struggles? What does Marx mean by social classes? Why does Marx
think classes are so important? How do they make history?
2. How have class societies varied,
according to Marx? What does he see as distinctive about the nature
of the class structure under capitalism?
3. What is Marx's attitude towards
the bourgeoisie? What historical role does he see it as playing?
Is his view an entirely negative one?
4. Why does Marx believe that capitalism
is inherently unstable, that it contains within itself the seeds
of its own destruction?
5. Marx believes that classes go
through stages in their development. How does he describe the
development of the proletariat? Why does he believe it is likely
to play a revolutionary role? What role does he attribute to intellectuals
like himself?
Lewis Coser, A
Summary of Ideas:"Class Theory " at
Dead Sociologists Index (online;
click on appropriate link to access text)
1. In "Class Theory," focus
on Coser's discussion of the distinction between class-in-itself and class-for-itself,
and what it takes for an aggregate of people to move from
the first to the second. This is at the core of Marx's class
theory, and his analysis of the necessary conditions for this
to occur is nuanced and sophisticated. What do these two terms mean and what is the relation between them?
2. Why did Marx believe that the capitalist class
(bourgeoisie) could not in the end act collectively to secure
its own interest? Why did he think the working class would be different?
Marx,
"Preface to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy" (online; relate to C&M's "Marx's Theory of Politics")
This short statement provides an
extremely succinct statement of what might be called the "structural"
side of Marx's theory. Note the absence here of the emphasis on
class struggle found elsewhere in Marx's writings, e.g. the Communist
Manifesto. Here the emphasis is on the basic structure of
society, and on how contradictions in its mode of production inevitably
lead to instability and change. Try to make sense of the following
basic concepts and the relations between them:
civil society
political economy
relations of production
productive forces
mode of production
base and superstructure
fetters
ideology
contradictions
social revolution
social formation
prehistory
Lewis Coser, A
Summary of Ideas:"The Sociology of Knowledge"
at Dead Sociologists Index (online)
1. How does Marx analyze ideas? What is his sociology
of knowledge?
2. How did Marx and Engels "soften" their position
somewhat in their later years?
Marx on the "Opium of the People" (Answers.com/Wikipedia)
1. What is the general view of the relation between society and religion that Marx outlines in this quotation? What general characteristics and social functions does Marx see religion as having?
2. In this context, what does Marx mean by his famous statement: Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people"? Is religion nothing more than part of the ideological superstructure of society?
Salzman, Ch. 4: Cultural Materialism and
Political Economy, (pp. 49-66) and "Contra Materialism"
in Ch. 8 (pp. 130-131)
1. What are the basic tenets of
cultural materialism, as developed and explicated by Marvin Harris?
What is similar to and/or different from Marx?
2. How does Harris use these ideas
to explain cow veneration in India? The view of pork as "unclean"
in Middle Eastern cultures?
3. Note the distinctions between
etic/emic and behavioral/mental in Harris' work.
4. What are the basic tenets of
anthropological political economy? What is similar to and/or different
from Marx? Be familiar with the approach of Eric Wolf.
5. If we use Kuhn's terms, would
you agree that cultural materialism and political economy in anthropology
basically represent a kind of "normal science" puzzle-solving
applied to non-Western societies? Or is something more original
involved?
6. From the "Contra Materialism" section: What are the major criticisms
that have been leveled against Marxist-inspired materialism in
anthropology?
|